Li Yongjun's summary In recent years, there has been a fierce game between the official discourse of "Dayi's annihilation" and the folk discourse of "kissing relatives". In the process of this game, the rights appeal of relatives exempt is growing. The legislation on the immunity of relatives first opened in the field of testimony in criminal proceedings, but due to the game between the interests of the department, the original intention of the system was not realized. The revival of traditional culture provides a source of rationality and motivation for the return of “close relativesâ€, but the traditional way of thinking has set up various obstacles for the true relatives to testify immunity. The game from the positive and negative forces of culture makes this right unique to China. The Chinese face of relative immunity should be viewed rationally. The legislation should follow a path of gradual, limited, continuous improvement, and mature promotion in China.
In 2010, the Hebei Provincial Higher People's Court issued the Supreme Court's Sentencing Guidance (Trial) Regulations (hereinafter referred to as the “Regulationsâ€): “The relatives of the defendant reported the defendant's crime, provided the defendant with a hidden place or led the judicial personnel to arrest the defendant. And if there are other cases that assist the judicial organs in detecting cases and arresting the accused, they may reduce the defendant's benchmark penalty by less than 20% as appropriate." The provision came out, and the public opinion criticism, most public opinion believes that this encourages "big righteousness" The judicial policy is a move that violates human nature and undermines the trust mechanism. (1) During the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2011, public opinion was generally praised for the new provisions of the draft “not forcing close relatives to testify in courtâ€, or that this is the concept of “kissing relatives†in ancient China. Returning, or thinking that it is subversion, is established. 3 Behind the paradoxes in these two directions, in fact, the common position of the people is revealed, that is, the professor and doctoral tutor of the Center for Theoretical and Law Studies at the University of Jilin University. This article is the 2011 plan. The research results of the Judicial Civilization Collaborative Innovation Center and the phased results of the Ministry of Justice project "The Application and Application of Chinese Traditional Family Ethics in Modern Judicature" (12SFB2003).
See ridiculous: Hebei stipulates that the relatives of the righteous annihilation of the pro-accused can be commuted, including the Beijing News on October 2, 2010, the A02 version: Hebei's relatives of the "Dayi annihilation" defendants can be commuted to dispute, including China Radio Network October 4, 2010; Xu Reformation: Relatives "deeds and annihilation", criminals commuted, and a "highly discretionary sentence" in Hebei Higher Court cited controversy, and the report was published on October 12, 2010, the third edition.
Liu Dong: Do not force close relatives to appear in court to reveal the progress of the rule of law civilization. The 8th version of the Criminal Procedure Law overhauls the subversion of the righteousness of the prosperous Man Wenjun can refuse to prove his wife drug abuse, including the Beijing Evening News on August 31, 2011.
Li Kejie: ​​"Residents can refuse to testify" to make the law more humane, including the procuratorial daily newspaper August 24, 2011, the sixth edition.
The public hopes that the country should give more tolerance to family. Therefore, we will further introduce the question of how the law should treat family issues in modern society. The law is the norm that regulates people's behavior, while the real people are emotional animals, and no one can escape the family. Therefore, the law must encounter the problem of coordination with family in its operation.
In the face of family ties, China has had two concepts of ''Kissing and Kissing' and "Devotion of the Righteousness" since ancient times. Although they have different positions, they are not mutually exclusive with the moral tradition of the Chinese. Although moralism is not unique to modern law. Adhere to the position, but if some laws disregard or even deviate from basic social morality, then its legitimacy may be questioned. The principle of "illegal law" may motivate people to resist such laws. From this point of view, the law The question of the choice of the two positions of ''Kissing and Kissing' and "Fighting the Righteousness" is not an irrelevant issue, but a question worthy of letting the legislator ponder or even let it suffer. Because the legislator must face the entanglement of the two, and the abandonment of any kind of position may encounter the moral crisis of the law, in which some values ​​of the law may be derogated to varying degrees. The difficulty of this issue is not limited to this. The current China is in a critical period of reform and development, and the strategy of building the rule of law has prompted the state to use legislation as a routine measure to rebuild the interests. However, for a country like China that is in the post-development stage of the legal modernization process, certain legislations often become extremely difficult and complicated due to the blending and collision of old and new systems, old and new interests, traditions and modern concepts.
In other words, certain legislative processes are often a difficult game between various forces. It is precisely because of this that the law has become more complicated in the choice of the position of "kissing relatives" and "dealing the pros and cons", because in this game, legislators need to make value choices and position choices on more issues. Specifically, driven by utilitarianism, the state and the people have different interests and thus hold different positions. Due to the consideration of order and efficiency, the country is more inclined to let the people 'decisively annihilate the pros and the people are more willing to proceed from the perspective of freedom or rights. I hope that the state can let them 'close to each other', and how should the legislators choose this time? In the face of the pressure of traditional state power and the growing demand for rights of the people, the interests of the departments that depend on the legal system of "righteousness and annihilation" belong to different entities and the people are eager to "relax" the family based on good humanity. The conflict between desires and the reform of the interests pattern, how should the legislators weigh, from the cultural tradition, the "kissing of relatives" has its historical foundation, from the perspective of revolutionary tradition, "the great deeds" Its legitimacy, in the modern society where traditional culture is reverted and the political politics of the law is weakening, how should the legislator's position be chosen in dealing with family issues, and further, back and forth between the official and the private, traditional and modern The game between power and power, power and power.
In this process, we can see that the country’s authoritarian thinking is loosening, and the emerging rights of a relative immunity have begun to sprout and start in legislation, but at the same time we will see that due to the complexity of this game, This kind of right encountered an unusual experience in the process of establishment and presented a unique face of China.
The game between national discourse and folk discourse In Foucault's theory, power is not only something that is related to law and state machine, power comes from all sides, everywhere, and discourse also constitutes a kind of power. Borrowing Foucault's theory of "kissing relatives" and "big righteousness" is a power game in Chinese society.
It is no stranger to mention ''Kissing intimately' with Chinese. Traditional China is a patriarchal ethical society, and family is the most important bond to maintain the society. Therefore, the state often regards maintaining family as a higher law to protect. The value of this. For this reason, in China, the relatives appear in the form of official discourse. This is manifested in the aspect that, in the mainstream ideology, the ruler has always advocated the mutual hiding between relatives. Confucius's expression of this should be the most convincing. Confucius once had the argument that "the father is the child, the child is the father, and he is in it." 5 Mencius designed a scheme of 'stolen and fleeing according to the family and the law of the country. 6 On the other hand, in legal practice, the state has always regarded "kissing relatives" as the people. An obligation, and the scope of ''hidden') has gradually expanded, and even the Tang Dynasty has even developed into a "cohabitation." In line with this, the law also stipulates a system of compulsory relatives' refusal to certify. For example, the head of the Da Ming law stipulates: "The younger brother does not plead with the brother, the wife does not prove the husband, the slave does not prove the lord." Since the late Qing Dynasty, with the advancement of the modernization of the legal system, the original contents of the characteristics of the Chinese legal system have been almost abandoned, but the system and concept of "kissing relatives" have been preserved after necessary transformation. According to Mr. Fan Zhongxin's investigation, from the Qing Dynasty's new criminal law to the Republic of China's criminal law, he has retained the detention of relatives for the protection of relatives and the imposition of evidence, indulgence or convenience for relatives to escape the punishment, for the benefit of relatives, perjury and false accusation, surrender for relatives or Replacement of impunity, confiscation of grievances for relatives, right to refuse to prove that relatives are guilty, and against relatives may not file a private prosecution.
With the establishment of the new China, the official discourse on ''Kissing and Kissing') began to be interrupted, which directly represented the ''Kissing and Kissing' system) along with the old law and was abolished. On the surface, the interruption of this discourse is due to the need for the new regime to break with the old system. In fact, there are deeper reasons behind this. First of all, the "philosophy of struggle" played an important role in it. Since the new democratic revolution, the Chinese revolution has always been guided by a "philosophy of struggle." This philosophy is based on a certain degree of denial of family and tradition. From the standpoint of class, it attempts to replace the family ethics with blood and marriage as a link to a 'comrade-style' political ethic. Often political ethics should be "great justice". At the same time, under the guidance of this philosophy of struggle, crime is usually considered as "an isolated personal objection. See Faforc: History of Sexual Experience, translated by Qi Biping, Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2002, 63, 5 pages.
The struggle for ruling relations "8 is the product of irreconcilable class struggle. Thus, criminals are often seen as part of the reactionary class. Therefore, cooperating with the state to take crimes is regarded as an important political task given to each citizen by the state. It is the "big righteousness" that every revolutionary must insist on. This kind of insistence on "big righteousness" is no exception even if it encounters family ties. Progressively, influenced by the "philosophy of struggle", in real life, political ethics In the natural state, the classification of human "relatives" and "non-relatives" is changed to the classification of ''comrades'' and "enemies". According to this political logic, although there is a murder of the father, but the same revolutionary camp will also become a comrade because of the enemy, and although there is the right to raise and the righteousness, but because of standing in the opposite camp They should also be regarded as enemies in each other. Then, when someone sinned, he alienated the opposite side of the people, and the relationship between him and his relatives evolved into an enemy-friend relationship without exception.
Therefore, even in the face of the crimes of relatives, no one has any reason not to expose crimes, not to cooperate with the state to punish crimes. If this is negatively slackened and even facilitates the perpetrators, it is a political "capital" behavior, which should naturally be severely punished by the law.
Secondly, the "humanity view" of revolutionaryism is another cause of the traditional interruption of "close relatives". Because of the mechanical application of Marx's "the essence of man is not the abstraction inherent in a single person, in its reality, it is the sum of the social relations," the revolutionary "human view" often believes that human nature is not Innate and immutable things, but the product of specific social relations; in class society, the problem of human nature is the problem of class nature, that is, it cannot be separated from class to talk about human nature. Therefore, family is not inherent in human nature, it should be subordinate to class. Class society is a union of non-blood and unrelated, which is regulated by the unified political ethics within the class. The family is maintained by the private level of family ethics, which is far from the relatively universal political ethics. A qualified revolutionary must dare to step out of his family and get rid of the shackles of family ethics, especially when family and class conflicts. In time, he must be able to overcome his narrow family with class emotions. When political ethics is characterized in the form of law, the conflict between family and class is directly manifested as the conflict between family ethics and legal norms.
Therefore, when a loved one breaks the law, every revolutionary (or citizen) can not only cover it, but should courageously report and expose it.
Under the guidance of this "philosophy of struggle" and the "humanity view" of revolutionism, the family and family concept has been criticized. The official discourse status of "kissing relatives" has been subverted, and of course it is a kind of "big righteousness" The form of discourse expression. This kind of discourse profoundly affects the legislation and judiciary of the new China before the reform and opening up. This is manifested as: The act of "dealing the pros and cons" is often supported and commended by official discourse as a measure of justice. In this way, this official discourse is often expressed in three ways: it is given a case-by-case commendation in the form of a typical case; Gao Minglu, editor: Chinese Criminal Law, Renmin University of China Press, 1989, p. 25.
Wen Yiquan: Yang Guixin reports his father, carrying life knowledge on May 11, 1951; Xu Dongcai stabilized the people's position and prosecuted the profiteer's father, carrying the People's Daily on February 6, 1952; Hu Yuxiu: Family woman Wang Peifang resolutely prosecuted the spy husband, carrying the Liberation Daily 1951 May 9th, and so on.
Second, it is universally affirmed in the form of documents, editorials, and leaders' speeches; third, it is explicitly supported in the form of judicial interpretation. And because of the revolutionary needs against patriarchal power, husband's rights, and parental rights, the state especially encourages and supports the "righteousness and annihilation" of the young and the esteemed. So in those years, the children exposed their fathers and wives to expose their husbands and younger brothers to expose their brothers’ "many examples" and "moving deeds" that "cry a family crying and not crying". In the official discourse, "the great deeds" and "the courage" Words such as "exposure" and "daring prosecution" appear frequently. This kind of discourse reached its peak in the ''Cultural Revolution' with the proliferation of extreme "Left" thoughts.
In the present China, although the influence of class theory and struggle philosophy is gradually weakening, and the law is gradually depoliticizing, the discourse based on the inertia of history is still stubbornly retained in the current Chinese legal system. In the process of depoliticization of law, the position of nationalism has quietly replaced the position of classism and has re-emerged as the reason and soil for supporting the discourse of the "big righteousness and annihilation". In other words, cooperating with the country to take its own relatives is not a political task for citizens, but it is still a due state obligation.
Although the behavior cannot be defined as a political "capital" behavior, it still belongs to the illegal act of helping criminals. For this reason, Articles 162 and 172 of the Criminal Law of 1979 and Articles 305, 306 and 310 of the Criminal Law of 1997 stipulate that no one who knows the circumstances of a criminal suspect, including relatives, cannot As a perjury, it is impossible to carry out acts of concealment or cover-up, otherwise it constitutes a crime; the Criminal Procedure Laws of 1979 and 1996 stipulate that “all persons who know the circumstances of the case have the obligation to testifyâ€, and close relatives cannot be excluded. The current Criminal Procedure Law This continuation of such regulations.
The so-called nationalist stance is a position that gives priority to the interests of the state in the pattern of diversified interests. The logic is that human beings are social animals and must live in a political body like the state. The state is self-sufficient and self-consistent. The national interests, will and purpose are regarded as more advanced than individual or non-state organizations. "Good" presents undoubted superiority. However, individuals or non-state organizations have an obligation to ensure that this superiority of the country's superiority of sexuality and devotionality clearly reflects this nationalist stance. The establishment of the system is entirely conducive to detecting cases and cracking down on crimes. It is the premise and goal of punishing crimes and maintaining the overall social order. In order to achieve this goal, all forces and resources must be mobilized to use all available means to fight against criminals. Individuals should obey such goals. Therefore, for a long time after the reform and opening up, the official textbook ''people are also more willing to fight against the counter-revolution. For example, the incidents of counter-revolutionary incidents have increased unprecedentedly. Some wives accused the counter-revolutionary husbands, and some sons accused the sinful fathers. Because this so-called father not only persecuted the people, but also persecuted his own sons in all directions. Expanding the report of Luo Ruiqing and the director of the Beijing Public Security Bureau at the joint meeting, the People’s Daily reported on May 22, 1951: "In many places, there have also been children’s prosecutions of spies and other fathers and deeds." See the release of the masses to lodge complaints and accuse the counter-revolutionaries. On May 21, 1951, the People’s Daily reported that the counter-revolutionaries were listed on the Northeast Daily on May 5, 1951.
On December 2, 1964, the Supreme People's Court stated in the reply that the children of the counter-revolutionaries demanded that they should be separated from their parents. "The children of the counter-revolutionaries demand that separation from their parents is a very complicated political issue. We think this is a treat. The problem should be handled in a positive way to encourage their progress requirements."
See the previous introduction.
See Sun Bangyi: How do I go from "Dayi to save my relatives" to "Dayi and kill the pro", published in the Daily News on May 10, 1951; see the previous quote.
The theory of scholars and scholars still interprets the idea that "in our country, the interests of the state and the people are above all else, and the violation of the interests of the state and the people, each known citizen has the obligation to report, expose and testify. Regardless of the relationship with the accused, no matter how the situation is obtained. It is illegal to advocate the spirit of 'dealing righteousness and detoxification', knowing it or intentionally hiding the evidence." "Our socialist law is the concentrated expression of the will of the people." In order to safeguard the democratic dignity of the people, in order to safeguard the dignity of the socialist law, we should vigorously advocate the spirit of 'great justice and annihilation', and the construction of the "father and son" and the rest of the poison must be thoroughly criticized and rejected. Although the legal system of "great justice and annihilation" appeared in the face of nationalism, although it lost its previous political nature and added more procedural and certainty, it is determined by the nature of nationalism that its intolerance of ethical affection is no more than classism. Inferior conditions, even under special conditions, have been strengthened in some areas. For example, in 1982 With the deconstruction of the political society, the concept of human nature and the concept of family began to return, and the concept of human rights and the rule of law gradually gained. In this process, the legal system of "big righteousness and annihilation" gradually became questioned by the public. And critique, the law should give the necessary tolerance to the relatives to begin to grow, these criticisms and appeals gradually form a non-negligible folk discourse from weak to strong. As early as the 1996 Criminal Procedure Law amendment, the 1997 Criminal Law revision, Some scholars, including Liu Renwen, have called for the granting of criminal immunity to relatives. In 2003, the draft of the Civil Evidence Law drafted by Tang Weijian and other scholars clearly designed the content of relatives and people with specific occupations who could refuse to testify.
In 2007, a NPC deputy submitted a proposal to the General Office of the National People's Congress Standing Committee to restore relatives' tolerance as soon as possible. In 2010, after the introduction of the relevant implementation rules by the Hebei Provincial High Court, the criticism of “almost one side†fully reflected the people’s resentment against the “big righteousness†legislation and the expectation that the law would be tolerant of family. Recently, the network’s opinion polls on “Dayi’s annihilation†also showed that up to 55.4% of the people objected, and only 26. 2% said they supported it.
Academic circles are one of the main positions of folk discourse. Scholars have expressed a high degree of consistency in the critique of "the great deeds." This kind of critique is usually carried out in a "natural law" way, that is, scholars believe that there is a higher value of natural justice in the existing legal order that needs to be protected, and that "the righteousness and degeneration" destroys these. value. First of all, from the perspective of human nature, it is believed that the pursuit of "big righteousness and annihilation" violates human nature; secondly, from the perspective of trust, it is believed that the pursuit of "great justice and annihilation" is the destruction of the trust relationship that human society relies on; thirdly, from the perspective of family ethics, It is believed that the pursuit of "big righteousness" is not conducive to the maintenance of family relationships. In the presuppositions of scholars, the good law is to take care of these 10 Zhang Pei, Chen Guangzhong: Criminal Evidence Theory, Mass Publishing House, 1982, p. 210.
10 Yu Ronggen: General Theory of Confucianism, Guangxi People's Publishing House, 1992, p. 277.
Huang Xiuli et al: The choice of sentencing: "Dayi annihilation" or "Kissing relatives", Southern Weekend October 14, 2010, A04 version Wen Jianmin: China's first evidence law will be reported to the National People's Congress witnesses can refuse to testify, with the new express January 20, 2003.
Guo Qiyong talked about the overhaul of the Criminal Procedure Law: Why did the great righteousness and dereliction of the pro-independence, and the China News Network, May 17, 2012.
Zhang Qian: The family members of the deceased can be sheltered and carry the youth weekend on October 21, 2010.
Value. Therefore, they generally use the words 'the father and the son, the couple's way, the nature is also such a sentence to demonstrate the rationality of the anti-humanity and the "close relatives" of ''Day of Defence'; they often use Beccaria, Meng Dessin and other enlightenment thinkers, the views of new natural lawists such as Fuller and Rawls, show that the law should be tolerant of affection and humanity. From the perspective of Western academic traditions, such arguments can be said to be a kind of 'natural law' argument, but from the perspective of Chinese cultural traditions, such arguments can also be expressed as a kind of "two-point" The argument is that the so-called "rational, the way of doing things, the nature of biology is also; the gas is also the person who goes down, the instrument of the bottom, the creatures also. 12 The logic of its argument is that there should be more “Tao†on the instrumental system, and “Tao†is the foundation on which this society depends. Humanity, trust, and ethics are undoubtedly such a "dao". If the current empirical law operates in a manner that violates these ''dao's', the consequences it brings to the society are undoubtedly subversive. In fact, no matter which The arguments are all based on a critical thinking. The ultimate goal is to oppose the legalist thinking of the law on family issues from the standpoint of rights, and call on the state to give more autonomy to the people in the choice of family and national law. The necessary humanity and ethical values.
Since the initiator of the "big righteousness and annihilation" type of legal system is ''revolutionary politics', then its opponents are more willing to start from the "presentation", "time-space flashback", "exclusive case extraction", etc.: I have witnessed the father and son. The murder between the two, the mutual exposure of the husband and wife, the rebelliousness between the brothers, and the embarrassment of the students to the teachers are really bitter. The cruel scene of the scene is still in my mind, and I will come to my attention from time to time. That is the tragedy of Mencius's so-called "human food"! "The closest relationship in the private sphere, such as the family, father, son, brother, couple, etc., then friends, teachers, students and other friendships have been destroyed, and each other has fallen into the ground, revealing the sale, and even private words and deeds have become The evidence of crime can only be the tragic appearance of the 'Cultural Revolution'. The testimony of relatives in the history of China and the practice of the rule of law in the modern world can not find an example, it is completely the product of the 'Cultural Revolution' extreme leftist trend of thought. Encourage people to be brave and mothers, and the situation of husband and wife exposing each other is everywhere. "In the anti-right struggle of 1957, in order to prove that their loved ones, friends, and teachers are guilty, how many people follow the example of Shu Yi's "Dayi and Defence" reveals the most secret things in normal interactions." Here, critics use history. The rhetorical tactics of the ideology are aimed at reflecting on the present. They metaphorically point the critique to the current politics of "deity and annihilation". With the gradual disintegration of China's political society and the gradual return of the concept of human nature, more and more people are beginning to think about the issue of "big righteousness and annihilation" politics and the legal system itself. high.
The critique of the legal system of "big righteousness and annihilation" is not derived from metaphysical mystery, but is supported by a profound social foundation. In reality, the law's torture of human nature and the helplessness of the people in the choice of love law support the criticism of the academic circles to varying degrees. A police officer from the criminal investigation line was quite touched: "When the public security organs investigate and collect evidence, most of their relatives adopt two attitudes: they do not support or resolutely oppose it, that is, they are contradictory. According to the Wuhan Public Security Bureau, they have been arrested for three consecutive years. The investigation of the escaped prisoner showed that 81.5% of the fugitives were harboured. The mother was arrested and imprisoned for hiding her criminal son. In prison, when the reporter interviewed her, she said: "I can hide Count the day and do your best. When he was interviewed by reporters who helped his daughter to escape, he still replied calmly: "With conscience, it is just today, when I ask her to take the daughter to report the case and surrender, it is unlikely." A father who reported his daughter’s possession of drugs learned that his daughter and his nephew had been sentenced to death. They often sneaked into their daughter’s room and shed tears, even regretting their reports. “What’s more, After reporting his brother’s murder, his brother couldn’t stand the pressure from all parties and eventually hanged himself. The reality behind the helplessness of the people is the reaction of the “big righteousness and annihilation†legislation to human nature. For this reason, the official and private evaluation of such behavior As early as in the 1980s, Jiang Pei-ling’s fiancé who fled the crime of financing, despite the punishment of the law, won the good reputation of “wife and wife Jiang Pei-ling†in the folk. In the "big righteousness", his wife was sentenced. Although his behavior is legally incomprehensible, in the eyes of the public it has become the image of a "good husband" who is not responsible. From this point of view, with the return of reason and humanity, the current legal system of "great justice and annihilation" in China is experiencing an unprecedented crisis of legitimacy. Therefore, it is not enough for the implementation rules of the Hebei Provincial High Court to be so repulsive. Oddly. In response to the general criticism of the people, scholars once commented: "The behind the public opinion boom is actually the conflict between citizens' high awareness of rights and the backward concept of the rule of law."
Behind the folk discourse implies a new form of rights. The immunity of relatives is sprouting and surging. Its power comes from the people themselves. It comes from the return of human nature and comes from the rational cognition of the shortcomings of the legal system.
However, its power cannot yet fundamentally subvert the legal model of "righteousness and annihilation" because the benefits brought by the model to the country, especially the resulting departmental interests, make the legislators unwilling or even afraid to completely abandon. This is the tradition. However, the growth and growth of folk discourse has undoubtedly put a certain pressure on the official. In order to make legislation and justice have vitality or reduce unnecessary resistance, legislators cannot completely ignore these paradoxes and discourses. At least the "mass line" is still the line that China must implement today. Therefore, the legislators no longer dare to "take the world's big and big" to directly enforce the legislation that forces people to "destroy the pros and cons," but try to reward the 3 high people's procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of National Security, and the premise of retaining existing legislation. The provisions of the Ministry of Justice jointly issued a number of issues concerning the examination and judgment of death penalty cases, whether "the close relatives of the accused assisted in the capture of the accused" is regarded as the plot of the defendant from a light sentence. The aforementioned regulations of the Hebei Provincial High Court are also based on such ideas. However, the voice of criticism does not seem to be weakened by this, and the hot debate triggered by the judicial decision of the Hebei Provincial High Court is evidence. Obviously, between the public opinion of the people and the legal tradition of the country, the legislators are in a dilemma. In order to comply with the needs of the people, the traditional legal system must have a breakthrough. The legislators first selected this breakthrough in the field of relatives' testimony.
But in the face of a solid tradition, the legislators dare not run too far, and at the same time it must take into account the interests of other departments. Just as the highest legislature has stated itself, it is necessary to "adhere to the specific national conditions of our country and gradually improve the perfection of China's criminal litigation system." It is necessary to keep pace with the times and not to surpass the actual situation at this stage." It is precisely because the legislators need to take into account the content and the need to balance too much interest, so the original "breakthrough" is actually not "breakthrough". The "bright spot" under the praise is actually not a 'bright spot' and the relatives testify immunity. It has a unique face in China.
Second, the Chinese side of the testimony immunity of relatives: the "pro-intimacy" legislation under the departmental power game Article 188, paragraph 1, of the Criminal Procedure Law amended in 2012 of China stipulates: "After the notice of the people's court, the witness does not appear in court without justified reasons. If the testimony is given, the people's court may force him to appear in court, except for the spouse's spouse, parents, and children." The provision was well received by public opinion as early as the draft of the Criminal Procedure Law amendment, and was once hailed as a modification of the Criminal Procedure Law. One of the highlights is seen as the beginning of the transition from the ''righteousness to the pro-intimacy' to the "close relatives" in legislation. Some even believe that China has thus established the expectation of public opinion. First, the clause only stipulates that no close relatives are allowed." "Testing in court" does not mean that close relatives can not testify, but they cannot be forced to appear in court. The close relatives of the accused can also testify by writing, recording, video, etc. without the appearance of the court. Therefore, the obligation of the close relatives to testify is still Secondly, such a provision only applies to the trial stage of the first instance, and does not run through the whole process of criminal proceedings, which is crucial for the identification of cases. There is no corresponding regulation in the stage of investigation or prosecution. The limitations of this regulation are quite profound: "The relatives of the defendant must not be forced to testify in court. First of all, it does not mean that relatives do not have the right to testify. Secondly, it does not mean that there is no The obligation to testify once again does not mean that the investigating officer cannot force (non-violent) evidence collection. In the end, it does not mean that the prosecution cannot submit evidence of the defendant’s relatives before and outside the court. In this way, the actual results have completely gone to the opposite side of the legislative intent. "Therefore he asserted that 'the clause has nothing to do with the relatives'." He even urged a publication to publish his views as soon as possible. Mr. Chen Guangzhong, a senior expert in criminal law law in China, also said to the media: "The provision 4 has not reached the level of denying the righteousness of the righteousness;" such a provision '' is far removed from the internationally accepted relatives’ refusal to testify. The feeling of semi-masking. From this point of view, the provision does not establish a true immunity for the testimony of relatives. To the maximum extent, it can only be said that the ''relatives in court to testify immunity†or "incomplete meaning" Relatives on the testimony immunity."
The limitations of this “incomplete sense of relatives’ testimony immunity†are not limited to this. At present, China's criminal justice actually pursues a referee mode defined by Professor Chen Ruihua's "taking the case record as the center", that is, judges generally read the transcripts transferred by the procuratorial organs to initiate pre-trial preparation activities, for witness testimony. The verbal evidence of the victim's statement, the defendant's confession, etc., is generally conducted by means of a transcript of the case file, and the ruling is usually made by citing the record of the case file produced by the investigator. Since the trial does not depend on witnesses appearing in court, witnesses appearing in court to become insignificant in criminal proceedings. According to empirical research by scholars, the current rate of witnesses appearing in criminal proceedings in China is less than 1%. Since the significance of witnesses appearing in court is so small, the significance of the appearance of witnesses in court can be much greater. Since the need for witnesses to appear in court is rare, Since the court can completely complete the trial without the relatives appearing in court, how much can such a provision of the new Criminal Procedure Law be meaningful? In fact, in my opinion, this is a separate name of ''name'' and 'real'. The symbolic meaning of the move is far greater than its actual meaning.
In fact, in China's criminal justice, the real need for witnesses to testify is not in the trial process but in the investigation process, because the task of discovering crimes is mainly done by the investigation organs. If we really care about human nature, protect human rights, and maintain trust, it is most meaningful to establish a system of witness testimony exemption at this stage. But if this is the case, it must face the two major departments of public security and prosecution, and their strong position determines that it is much more difficult to set up the system at this stage than in the trial. China's Constitution stipulates that the three organs of the Public Prosecution Law are responsible for the division of labor, mutual supervision, and mutual restraint. In theory, the three formed a kind of equal rights division of labor cooperation, but in the actual power structure, the weight index of the three is not equal. Due to the special functions of maintaining public security and social stability, the public security organs have an absolute advantage in terms of political status, number of personnel, and actual management capabilities. The procuratorial organs are specialized public power supervision organs stipulated in the Constitution of China, and public security organs and courts are under their supervision. In comparison, the court has neither the "strength" of the public security organs nor the "power" of the procuratorate, but has become a "vulnerable group" in the criminal litigation power structure. If the testimony of the relatives is applied to the investigation stage, it will inevitably increase the cost of detecting the case, and it will impact the existing powers of the public security organs and the procuratorate. They will naturally not sit back and watch their own interests be derogated, when they rely on their own strength. When fighting "power", it will inevitably put considerable pressure on legislators.其实，在æ¤æ¬¡åˆ‘诉法修改之åˆï¼Œç«‹æ³•ä¸“å®¶ä»¬ä¹ŸåŽŸæœ¬è®¾æƒ³åœ¨åˆ‘äº‹è¯‰è®¼å…¨ç¨‹è®¾ç«‹è¿™æ ·çš„è§„å®šï¼Œå¹¶ä¸”å·²ç»å°†æ¤å†™å…¥äº†å¾æ±‚æ„è§ç¨¿ä¸ï¼Œä½†åœ¨æ£å¼çš„文本ä¸ï¼Œå´â€œæœ€ç»ˆé€€å›žåŽ»äº†â€ã€‚ 5刑诉法现在的规定实际上是立法者对亲属作è¯è±å…æƒçš„1ç§â€œæ‰“折â€å¼çš„处ç†ï¼Œä¹‹æ‰€ä»¥å‡ºçŽ°è¿™æ ·çš„ç»“æžœï¼Œå…¶åŽŸå› å°±åœ¨äºŽå…¬å®‰å’Œæ£€å¯Ÿæœºå…³çš„æŠµè§¦ã€‚
è¿™ç§â€œæ‰“折å¼â€ç«‹æ³•çš„背åŽæŠ˜å°„出æ¥çš„是立法者在æƒåŠ›åšå¼ˆä¸çš„çº ç»“å’Œæ— å¥ˆã€‚å¯¹äººæ€§ç»™äºˆå¿…è¦å°Šé‡ã€ä¸å¼ºäººæ‰€éš¾ï¼Œæ˜¯çŽ°ä»£ç«‹æ³•çš„宗旨，它既是衡é‡éƒ¨æ³•å¾‹å…ˆè¿›ä¸Žå¦çš„é‡è¦æ ‡å¿—，也是该法律能å¦å¾—到民众认åŒçš„关键。éšç€ä¸å›½æ³•æ²»åŒ–è¿›ç¨‹çš„æŽ¨è¿›ï¼Œè¿™æ ·çš„è§‚å¿µä¹Ÿæ£é€æ¸æ·±å…¥åˆ°ç«‹æ³•è€…的内心。舆论对“大义ç亲â€å¼æ³•åˆ¶æ¨¡å¼çš„å感，也促使立法者è¦å¯¹ä¼ 统的“所有人都有作è¯çš„义务â€æ¨¡å¼äºˆä»¥çªç ´ã€‚于是立法者便有了开å¯äº²å±žä½œè¯è±å…æƒçš„动议。众所周知，任何改é©éƒ½æ˜¯ä¸€æ¬¡åˆ©ç›Šçš„调整，çªç ´ä¼ 统必然è¦è§¦çŠ¯åˆ°æŸäº›éƒ¨é—¨çš„利益，亲属作è¯è±å…自然也ä¸ä¾‹å¤–。当æŸäº›éƒ¨é—¨çš„利益å—到挑战时，这些部门便会å‘ç«‹æ³•è€…æ–½åŠ åŽ‹åŠ›ï¼Œç‰¹åˆ«æ˜¯å½“å¼ºåŠ¿éƒ¨é—¨å‘其施压时，立法者便ä¸èƒ½ä¸è€ƒè™‘它们的æ„è§ã€‚于是在强势部门利益é¢å‰ï¼Œè¯¥é¡¹ç«‹æ³•ä¸å¾—ä¸ç»•è¿‡å…¬å®‰æœºå…³ï¼Œä¹Ÿä¸å¾—ä¸ç»•è¿‡æ£€å¯Ÿæœºå…³ã€‚审判阶段是刑事诉讼的终æžçŽ¯èŠ‚，如果å†ç»•è¿‡æ³•é™¢ï¼Œäº²å±žä½œè¯è±å…æƒçš„立法设想便彻底æµäº§äº†ã€‚但如果å•å•ä¸æ”¾è¿‡æ³•é™¢ï¼Œéš¾é“法院的利益就应该“牺牲â€å—，法院虽然在刑事诉讼æƒåŠ›æž¶æž„ä¸å±žäºŽâ€œå¼±åŠ¿ç¾¤ä½“â€ï¼Œä½†å¯¹äºŽç«‹æ³•è€…æ¥è¯´ï¼Œå®ƒå¹¶ä¸å¼±åŠ¿ï¼Œå®ƒçš„利益和æ„è§éƒ½ä¸æ˜¯æ— 足轻é‡çš„。在æƒåŠ›åšå¼ˆä¸ï¼Œè®©æŸéƒ¨é—¨æŽ¥å—æŸåˆ¶åº¦çš„å‰æ是该制度必须ä¸èƒ½ä½¿å…¶åˆ©ç›Šå—æŸï¼Œè€Œæ³•é™¢ä¹‹æ‰€ä»¥èƒ½æŽ¥å—这一制度，æ£æ˜¯åŸºäºŽè¿™æ ·çš„ç†ç”±ã€‚
从ç†è®ºä¸Šè¯´ï¼Œå…¬æ£€æ³•ä¸‰æœºå…³çš„关系是ç§åˆ†å·¥è´Ÿè´£ã€äº’相监ç£ã€äº’相åˆä½œçš„关系，而事实上，由于出于惩罚犯罪的共åŒéœ€è¦ï¼Œå®ƒä»¬ä¹‹é—´å½¢æˆäº†ä¸€ä¸ªåˆ©ç›Šå…±åŒä½“ï¼Œå› æ¤ï¼Œåœ¨å®ƒä»¬ä¹‹é—´åˆä½œå¤šäºŽç›‘ç£ã€‚ç”±æ¤ï¼Œä¸å›½å½“下现实ä¸çš„刑事诉讼结构是一ç§å…¬æ£€æ³•ä¸‰ä½ä¸€ä½“ã€å‰åŽé€’è¿›ã€æŽ¥åŠ›äº’补的“线型â€ç»“构，刑事诉讼过程是一ç§ä¾¦æŸ¥ã€èµ·è¯‰ã€å®¡åˆ¤ä¾æ¬¡â€œæµæ°´ä½œä¸šâ€å¼çš„过程。由于刑事诉讼的主è¦ç›®çš„在于å‘现犯罪事实，所以诉讼过程的é‡å¿ƒåœ¨å®¡å‰è€Œä¸æ˜¯åœ¨å®¡åˆ¤ã€‚å› æ¤åœ¨è¿™æ ·çš„结构ä¸ï¼Œâ€œæ³•é™¢åªæ˜¯æˆ‘国公检法三机关è”åˆæƒ©ç½šçŠ¯ç½ªæµæ°´çº¿ä¸Šçš„最åŽä¸€ä¸ª'æ“作员'，法院的刑事审判活动并éžå®Œå…¨ç«™åœ¨ä¸ç«‹çš„立场上对追诉机关的刑事指控进行独立的审查和è£åˆ¤ï¼Œè€Œæ˜¯åœ¨æƒ©ç½šçŠ¯ç½ªé—®é¢˜ä¸Šèµ·åˆ°æŸ¥æ¼è¡¥ç¼ºçš„作用，以åŠé€šè¿‡å½¢å¼ä¸Šçš„法åºå®¡åˆ¤åº”景般对追诉机关的刑事指控进行最终的æƒå¨è®¤å®šï¼Œä»Žè€Œåœ¨ç¨‹åºä¸Šå®Œæˆæƒ©ç½šçŠ¯ç½ªçš„最åŽä¸€é“手ç»ã€‚â€è¿™æ ·ï¼Œå‡ºäºŽä¸ºå®Œæˆâ€œæœ€åŽé“å·¥åºâ€è€Œè¿›è¡Œçš„审判，法院在è¯æ®ä¸Šæ›´ä¾èµ–于侦查机关所å–得的笔录，更信赖于公诉机关的æ„è§ï¼Œæ£å› 如æ¤ï¼Œä¸€èˆ¬æƒ…况下，刑事审判是ä¸éœ€è¦è¯äººå‡ºåºçš„，或者说è¯äººå³ä½¿å‡ºåºäº†ï¼Œåœ¨æ—¢æœ‰çš„诉讼结构下，通常也ä¸ä¼šæ”¹å˜æ³•å®˜çš„“内心确信â€ã€‚当由公检法三家共åŒæž„建起æ¥çš„å ¡åž’è¶‹å‘于åšä¸å¯æ‘§æ—¶ï¼Œè¯äººå‡ºåºçš„价值便被消解了；当è¯äººå‡ºåºçš„价值被消解时，规定ä¸å¼ºè¿«è¯äººå‡ºåºè¿˜èƒ½æœ‰å¤šå¤§çš„æ„义昵，ä¸ä»…如æ¤ï¼Œåˆ‘诉法第188æ¡ä¸è§„定的åªæ˜¯''ä¸å¼ºè¿«åˆ°åºâ€œå¹¶ä¸æ˜¯å¯ä»¥æ‹’ç»ä½œè¯ï¼Œå¦‚果法院认为有必è¦è®©äº²å±žä½œè¯çš„，它ä¾ç„¶å¯ä»¥åœ¨åºä¸‹å®Œæˆã€‚并且，立法者并没有åƒå…¶å®ƒæ¡æ¬¾é‚£æ ·ä½¿ç”¨â€è¿‘亲属“的概念，而是有æ„将之é™ç¼©ä¸ºâ€é…å¶ã€çˆ¶æ¯ã€å女“。这或许是立法者出于å‡å°‘æ¥è‡ªæ³•é™¢çš„压力而作的ç–略性的处ç†ï¼Œä½†äº‹å®žæ˜¯ï¼Œæ³•é™¢çš„利益ä¸ä½†æ²¡æœ‰å—æŸï¼Œå而çµæ´»æ€§å¢žåŠ 了。æ£å› 如æ¤ï¼Œå¯¹äºŽè¿™æ ·çš„规定，法院并没有åƒå…¬ã€æ£€ä¸¤å¤§æœºå…³é‚£æ ·è¡¨çŽ°å‡ºæ˜Žæ˜¾çš„抵触。其实，法院也ä¸ä¼šæŠŠè¿™â€ä¸ç–¼ä¸ç—’“的规定当回事，在éšåŽçš„最高人民法院关于适用刑诉法的解释ä¸å¯¹å…¶ä¸ä½œä»»ä½•è§£é‡Šæ€§çš„规定就能看出这一点。
è¿™æ ·çœ‹æ¥ï¼Œè¯¥é¡¹è§„定并ä¸èƒ½å‘挥出关怀人性ã€ä¿æŠ¤äººæƒã€ç»´æŠ¤ä¿¡ä»»å…³ç³»çš„æ„义，æ¢è¨€ä¹‹ï¼Œåˆ‘事被告åŠå…¶äº²å±žå¹¶ä¸èƒ½ä»Žä¸å—益，相å，这ç§ä¸å®Œå…¨æ„义上的所谓的“亲属作è¯è±å…â€åœ¨å…¬æ£€æ³•ä¸‰æœºå…³â€œå…±è°‹â€çš„情况下，ä¸ä½†ä¸èƒ½å……当ä¿æŠ¤å½“事人的手段å而å¯èƒ½æˆä¸ºå±å®³å½“事人的机制。æ£å› 为该规定在侦查阶段没有亲属作è¯è±å…çš„é™åˆ¶ï¼Œä¾¦æŸ¥æœºå…³å®Œå…¨å¯ä»¥å¼ºè¿«äº²å±žä½œå‡ºä¸åˆ©äºŽçŠ¯ç½ªå«Œç–‘人的è¯è¯ï¼Œåˆ°äº†å®¡åˆ¤é˜¶æ®µï¼Œå½“其亲属愿æ„走上法åºæŽ¨ç¿»å…ˆå‰çš„ä¸å®žä¹‹è¯æˆ–公开其ä¸è¢«å¼ºè¿«çš„缘由时，而公诉方和审判机关则å¯èƒ½å‡ºäºŽç»´æŠ¤â€œå…±åŒåˆ©ç›Šâ€çš„考虑，é™åˆ¶è¯äººå‡ºåºï¼ŒäºŽæ˜¯è¿™ä¸€æ¡æ¬¾ä¾¿å¾ˆå¯èƒ½æˆä¸ºå®ƒä»¬ä¸è®©è¯äººå‡ºåºçš„借å£ï¼Œè¿™æ ·ï¼Œå¸æ³•æœºå…³ä¾¿ä¼šä»¥è½å®žäº²å±žä½œè¯è±å…æƒçš„å义æ¥å‰¥å¤ºè¢«å‘Šäººçš„è´¨è¯æƒã€‚6陈光ä¸å…ˆç”Ÿè¯´å¾—好：刑诉法的修改是一次部门æƒåŠ›ä¸ŽæƒåŠ›ä¹‹é—´çš„åšå¼ˆã€‚这一点生动地体现在了当下亲属作è¯è±å…æƒçš„立法ä¸ã€‚ç»è¿‡è¿™ç§æƒåŠ›çš„åšå¼ˆï¼Œç»è¿‡è¿™ç§ç«‹æ³•çš„个å实ä¸ç¬¦çš„“形象工程â€ã€‚在笔者看æ¥ï¼Œä»Žâ€œäº²å±žä½œè¯è±å…æƒâ€è½°è½°çƒˆçƒˆåœ°æ出，到舆有一ç§æ›´æ·±å±‚的力é‡åœ¨å‘挥ç€ä½œç”¨ï¼Œè¿™ç§åŠ›é‡æˆ‘们必须è¦åˆ°æ–‡åŒ–的层é¢æ¥å¯»æ‰¾ã€‚
三ã€â€œäº²äº²ç›¸éšâ€çš„å¤å…´ä¸Žè¿Ÿæ»žï¼šæ¥è‡ªæ–‡åŒ–ä¼ ç»Ÿçš„åŠ¨åŠ›ä¸Žé˜»åŠ›çš„å¤å½’åŠ©æŽ¨äº†è¿™æ ·çš„æ€æ½®ä¸Žè¯è¯ã€‚ä¼—æ‰€å‘¨çŸ¥ï¼Œä¼ ç»Ÿä¸å›½çš„法治资æºæ˜¯ä¸è¶³çš„，于是æ‰æœ‰äº†è‡ªæ™šæ¸…法制改é©ä»¥æ¥çš„法制现代化è¿åŠ¨ã€‚æ£å› 如æ¤ï¼ŒçŽ°ä»£ä¸å›½çš„法律和法å¦ä»ŽæŸç§ç¨‹åº¦ä¸Šè¯´æ˜¯åœ¨â€œä»¿åˆ¶â€è¥¿æ–¹çš„æ„义上建立的。æ¢è¨€ä¹‹ï¼Œä¸å›½çš„法制现代化从æŸç§æ„义上说其实是一个''西化“的过程。é¢å¯¹ç”±è¥¿æ–¹è¯è¯ä¸»å¯¼çš„ä¸å›½æ³•åˆ¶çŽ°ä»£åŒ–，其实国人心ä¸å˜æœ‰ç§â€ä¸å¾—ä¸â€œçš„苦痛和â€æ¬²è¿Žè¿˜æ‹’“心æ€ã€‚å…¶æ ¹æºåœ¨äºŽå›½äººå¯¹å¾…西方文化æŒæœ‰ç§æ—¢â€ç¦»ä¸å¼€â€œåˆä¸æ„¿è¡¨ç¤ºå‡ºâ€è¿‡åˆ†äº²è¿‘“ã€æ—¢é’¦ä½©åˆä¸æ„¿â€æ”¾ä¸‹æž¶å“ã€'åƒé¥±äº†è¿˜è¦éª‚厨åâ€èˆ¬çš„心æ€ã€‚å› ä¸ºä¸¤åƒå¤šå¹´æ¥çš„ä¸åŽæ–‡åŒ–曾称雄于世界，蛮ã€å¤·ã€æˆŽã€ç‹„都ä¾èµ–于ä¸åŽæ–‡åŒ–的滋养旦这个ä½å被别人抢å ，国人的失è½æ„Ÿå’Œä¸æƒ…愿便会滋生。æ£æ˜¯åŸºäºŽè¿™ç§å¤±è½æ„Ÿå’Œä¸æƒ…愿，ä¸å›½äººæ›´æ„¿æ„ä»Žä¼ ç»Ÿä¸å¯»æ‰¾çŽ°ä»£æ€§çš„æ ¹æ®ï¼Œæ›´æ„¿æ„把æŸäº›çŽ°ä»£æ€§çš„东西表述æˆâ€œå¤ä¹‹å°±æœ‰â€çš„东西。这ç§å¿ƒæ€æ¯”较典型地体现在''亲亲相éšâ€œçš„æ€æ½®çš„å¤å…´ä¸ã€‚
亲属间的容éšæºäºŽå–„良的人性和本能，而对这些人性和本能的宽容与尊é‡æ˜¯è‰¯æ³•å¿…备的å“æ ¼ã€‚å› æ¤ï¼Œå®¹éšåˆ¶åº¦å¹¶ä¸æ˜¯ä¸å›½ä¼ 统社会的特有产物，而是跨越时空的在人类历å²ä¸Šçš„æ™®éå˜åœ¨çš„现象。法å²å¦ç•Œçš„ç ”ç©¶è¯å®žäº†è¿™ä¸€ç‚¹ã€‚æ®èŒƒå¿ 信先生的考察，容éšåˆ¶åº¦ä¸ä»…ä»…å˜åœ¨äºŽä¸åŽæ³•ç³»ï¼Œåœ¨è¥¿æ–¹ï¼Œæ—©åœ¨å¤å¸Œè…Šã€å¤ç½—马时期该制度就已å˜åœ¨ï¼Œåœ¨è¿‘现代大陆法系ã€è‹±ç¾Žæ³•ç³»ã€ç¤¾ä¼šä¸»ä¹‰æ³•ç³»å›½å®¶å¯¹ä¹‹éƒ½æœ‰æ˜Žç¡®çš„æ³•å¾‹è§„å¿ â€œäº²äº²ç›¸ä¸ºéšåˆ¶åº¦å’ŒçŽ°è±¡ï¼Œä¸æ˜¯æŸä¸€ä¸ªå›½å®¶å’Œæ°‘æ—æ–‡åŒ–ä¼ ç»Ÿä¸çš„特有现象，也ä¸æ˜¯æŸä¸€ä¸ªåŽ†å²é˜¶æ®µçš„特有现象，也ä¸è·Ÿç‰¹å®šçš„社会制度共å˜äº¡ã€‚â€â€œä¸åŒçš„时代ä¸åŒæ°‘æ—ä¸åŒåœ°åŸŸçš„法律文化，虽外观åƒå§¿ç™¾æ€ï¼Œä½†ä»–们在æŸäº›æ ¹æœ¬çš„问题上常有ç€æ ¹æœ¬çš„共性：通过法定的庄严制度规范ä¿éšœè‡ªå·±çš„社会ä¸æ–'文化'一å‘'æ–‡'（文明ã€äººé“）而'化'（进化）。容éšåˆ¶åº¦ä¹Ÿæ£æ˜¯è¿™ç§å…±æ€§çš„典型体现之。â€æ—¢ç„¶æ˜¯''共性“，既然ä¸ä¸ºæˆ‘å›½ä¼ ç»Ÿæ‰€ç‹¬æœ‰ï¼Œé‚£ä¹ˆåœ¨å½“ä¸‹æˆ‘å›½çš„ç«‹æ³•ä¸æ— 论是开å¯äº²å±žåŒ…庇伪è¯çš„除罪化工程还是确立亲属作è¯è±å…æƒåˆ¶åº¦ï¼Œåœ¨å…¶åˆæ³•æ€§ä»¥åŠåŠ¨åŠ›æ¥æºä¸Šæ˜¯è¡¨è¿°ä¸º''ç»§æ‰¿ä¼ ç»Ÿâ€è¿˜æ˜¯''移æ¤å¤–æ³•â€œéƒ½æ˜¯æ— æ‰€è°“çš„ã€‚ä½†æ˜¯ä¸å›½å¦è€…在é˜é‡Šè¿™ä¸€é—®é¢˜çš„时候，更多地则是先从ä¸å›½å¤ä»£çš„â€äº²äº²ç›¸éšâ€œå…¥æ‰‹ï¼Œç„¶åŽæ‰è”系国外的亲属è±å…æƒçš„相关规定。这点在关于刑诉法第188æ¡çš„讨论ä¸ä½“现得éžå¸¸æ˜Žæ˜¾ï¼Œä¸ºäº†è¡¨å¾å…¶åˆç†æ€§ï¼Œå¦è€…和媒体更愿æ„把它与ä¸å›½å¤ä»£çš„â€äº²äº²ç›¸éšâ€œè¿žåœ¨ä¸€èµ·ã€‚
其实，如果真的è¦åœ¨ä¸å›½å»ºç«‹äº²å±žè±å…æƒåˆ¶åº¦ï¼Œå€Ÿé‰´è¥¿æ–¹å›½å®¶çš„ç»éªŒè¦è¿œæ¯”ä¸å›½çš„ä¼ ç»ŸåŠ¡å®žå¾—å¤šã€‚å› ä¸ºä¼ ç»Ÿä¸çš„“亲亲相éšâ€æ¯•ç«Ÿå»ºç«‹åœ¨å®—法宗æ—社会之上，它首先是为维护尊å‘ç‰çº§ç§©åºè€ŒæœåŠ¡çš„，其ä¸å³ä½¿æœ‰å°Šé‡äººçš„本能ã€å…³æ€€äººæ€§çš„性质，但其最终也è¦æœä»Žè¿™ä¸€ç›®çš„。æ£å› 如æ¤ï¼Œä¼ 统法律è¦æ±‚ä¸å›½äººå¿…é¡»''亲亲相éšâ€œå³''亲亲相éšâ€æ˜¯äººçš„义务而ä¸æ˜¯äººçš„æƒåˆ©ï¼Œä¸å®¹éšå而是犯罪，特别是在当å‘亲属é‡åˆ°å°Šäº²å±žçŠ¯ç½ªæ—¶ï¼Œå°±æ›´éœ€å¦‚æ¤ã€‚7æ£æ‰€è°““事亲有éšè€Œæ— 犯，左å³å°±å…»æ— æ–¹â€ã€‚而现代西方国家的相关规定是直接建立在人é“ã€äººæƒçš„基础上的，ä¸æå‘指è¯äº²å±žæ˜¯ä¸ªäººçš„æƒåˆ©ï¼Œå› 为它æºäºŽäººæ€§ï¼Œå‘ä¹Žæœ¬èƒ½ï¼Œå› è€Œåº”å¾—åˆ°æ³•å¾‹çš„å®½å®¹ã€‚åœ¨å…¨çƒåŒ–æ—¶ä»£ï¼Œæ˜¾ç„¶è¿™æ ·çš„ç«‹æ³•ç²¾ç¥žæ›´é€‚åˆäºŽçŽ°ä»£ä¸å›½ã€‚但是由于国人普éå˜åœ¨ç€ä¸Šé¢æ‰€æåŠçš„文化上的“ä¸æƒ…æ„¿â€çš„心ç†ï¼Œæ‰€ä»¥è¦åœ¨â€œç»§æ‰¿â€å’Œâ€œç§»æ¤â€ä¸¤ç§è¡¨è¿°ä¸æ¥ä½œé€‰æ‹©æ—¶ï¼Œä»–们更倾å‘于“继承â€çš„表述，或先表述为“继承â€ç„¶åŽæ‰è¡¨è¿°ä¸ºâ€œç§»æ¤â€ã€‚在政治制度ã€ç”Ÿæ´»æ–¹å¼ã€ä»·å€¼ç†å¿µç‰æ–¹é¢éƒ½ä¸Žä¼ 统社会å˜åœ¨ç€ä¼—多''质“的差异的现代社会，在充斥ç€å¤§é‡çš„ç”±è¥¿æ–¹ä¼ æ¥çš„技术与ç†å¿µçš„法制现代化进程ä¸ï¼Œå¶ç„¶é—´æŠŠä¸€ä¸ªåˆ¶åº¦çš„ç¡®ç«‹çš„æ ¹æ®è¡¨è¿°æˆæ¥è‡ªäºŽä¼ 统，其实就连表述者也ä¸è‡ªä¿¡ï¼Œä½†ä»–们往往会通过该制度æ¥æºäºŽä¼ 统而西方现代国家也有类似规定的方å¼æ¥è¯æ˜Žç»§æ‰¿ä¼ 统的æ£å½“性。æ£æ˜¯ç”±äºŽè¡¨è¿°è€…æ›´æ„¿æ„ã€æ›´æ€¥äºŽä»Žä¼ 统ä¸æ±²å–亲属è±å…æƒåˆ¶åº¦çš„æ£å½“性的è¯æ®ï¼Œå› 而他们常常将â€äº²äº²ç›¸éšâ€œçš„ä¼ ç»Ÿä»Žå…ˆç§¦ä¸€ç›´è´¯ç©¿åˆ°æ°‘å›½ï¼Œè€Œå¿½è§†äº†æ¤é—´åœ¨è¿‘代ä¸å›½æ‰€å‘生的质的å˜åŒ–，å³ä»Žæ¸…末法制改é©ä»¥åŽçš„â€äº²äº²ç›¸éšâ€œå·²ä»Žäººçš„义务å˜æˆäº†äººçš„æƒåˆ©äº†ã€‚ä¹Ÿå› å¦‚æ¤ï¼Œä»–们还忽视了两者在容éšé™åˆ¶æ–¹é¢çš„差异：ä¸å›½å¤ä»£æ›´å¼ºè°ƒä¿æŠ¤å›½å®¶åˆ©ç›Šå’Œæ„识形æ€ï¼Œå› æ¤''åæ¶â€ä¹‹ç½ªä¸åœ¨å®¹éšä¹‹åˆ—，而在近现代西方，由于法律政治性的弱化和强调个人æƒåˆ©çš„ä¿æŠ¤ï¼Œå„国纷纷å–消了“国事é‡ç½ªä¸å¾—éšâ€çš„规定。
è¿‘å¹´æ¥ï¼Œéšç€å„’å¦åœ¨ä¸–界范围内的兴起，ä¸å›½ä¼ 统文化ä¸çš„åˆç†å†…涵普éå—到é‡è§†ï¼Œè¿™è¶³ä»¥è®©å›½äººä¸ºä¹‹è‡ªè±ªã€‚然而，在其å‘æºåœ°ä¸€ä¸å›½ï¼Œå¯¹ä¼ ç»Ÿæ–‡åŒ–çš„ç ”ç©¶å’Œå‘展å´ç›¸å½“è½åŽï¼Œå› 为在''é©å‘½ä¸»ä¹‰â€œæ€æ½®ä¸‹ï¼Œå®ƒæ›¾é•¿æœŸè¢«å½“æˆå动和è½åŽçš„东西æ¥æ‰¹åˆ¤ã€‚ç»è¿‡å‡ å年和平稳定的å‘展，在世界范围内，ä¸å›½çš„ç»æµŽå®žåŠ›å’Œæ”¿æ²»åœ°ä½æ˜¾è‘—增强。然而，作为个大国，ä¸å…‰è¦æœ‰ç»æµŽå®žåŠ›å’Œæ”¿æ²»å®žåŠ›ï¼Œè¿˜è¦æœ‰æ–‡åŒ–实力。在世界结构ä¸ï¼Œä¸ªå›½å®¶ç‹¬ç«‹çš„è¯è¯æƒéœ€è¦å®ƒè‡ªèº«çš„文化体系和é…力æ¥æ”¯æŒã€‚显然，通过以往的亦æ¥äº¦è¶‹åœ°â€ä»¿åˆ¶â€œè¥¿æ–¹è¯è¯çš„æ–¹å¼æ˜¯æ— 法完æˆè¿™ä¸€ä»»åŠ¡çš„。由æ¤ï¼Œå›½å®¶å¼€å§‹æŠŠç›®æ ‡é”å®šåˆ°ä¼ ç»Ÿæ–‡åŒ–ä¸Šã€‚äºŽæ˜¯ï¼Œä¼ ç»Ÿæ–‡åŒ–çš„å¤å…´èŽ·å¾—了官方的鼓励和支æŒï¼Œå®ƒçš„å‘展也已ç»çº³å…¥åˆ°å›½å®¶æˆ˜ç•¥ä¹‹ä¸ï¼Œ8并被视为实现文化上的自觉ã€è‡ªä¿¡å’Œè‡ªå¼ºçš„å¿…é¡»ä¾èµ–的力é‡å’Œé€”径。
于是，当亲属è±å…æƒä»¥ä¸€ç§â€œäº²äº²ç›¸éšâ€çš„ä¼ ç»Ÿè¯è¯çš„æ–¹å¼æ¥è¡¨è¿°çš„时候，既满足了国人文化上的虚è£ï¼ŒåŒæ—¶ä¹Ÿå¥‘åˆäº†å›½å®¶æ„识形æ€ä¸Šçš„需è¦ï¼Œè¿™æ— ç–‘é™ä½Žäº†æ¥è‡ªæ°‘众和官方的拒斥程度，æ高了民众的å¯æŽ¥å—性和政治上的安全性。
然而，æ¥è‡ªä¼ 统文化的ä¸ä»…有动力，还有阻力。“大义ç亲â€æ³•åˆ¶æ¨¡å¼çš„å½¢æˆï¼Œè™½ç„¶çŽ°ä»£é©å‘½çš„“斗争哲å¦'ã€â€äººæ€§è§‚“起了主è¦ä½œç”¨ï¼Œä½†æ¥è‡ªä¼ 统的â€ç»“果主义“æ€ç»´å¯¹å…¶çš„å½±å“也ä¸èƒ½å°è§†ã€‚所谓â€ç»“果主义“就是ç§åªæ³¨é‡ç»“果而ä¸ç®¡è¿‡ç¨‹çš„价值观，认为åªæœ‰ç»“æžœæ‰æ˜¯æœ‰æ„义的ã€æœ‰ä»·å€¼çš„，而过程本身是没有æ„义ã€æ²¡æœ‰ä»·å€¼çš„，为追求æŸç§å›ºå®šçš„结果，å¯ä»¥ç‰ºç‰²ç¨‹åºï¼Œå¯ä»¥ä¸æ‹˜æ³¥å½¢å¼ã€‚这是å°å†œç¤¾ä¼šæ»‹ç”Ÿå‡ºæ¥çš„一ç§å®žç”¨ä¸»ä¹‰çš„价值观。该æ€ç»´å…¸åž‹åœ°ä½“现在å¤ä»£çš„战争ä¸ã€‚å™å兵法ä¸è¯´ï¼šâ€å…µè€…，诡é“也。故能而示之ä¸èƒ½ï¼Œç”¨è€Œç¤ºä¹‹ä¸ç”¨ï¼Œè¿‘而示之远，远而示之近。利而诱之，乱而å–之，实而备之，强而é¿ä¹‹ï¼Œæ€’è€ŒæŒ ä¹‹ï¼Œå‘è€Œéª„ä¹‹ï¼Œä½šè€ŒåŠ³ä¹‹ï¼Œäº²è€Œç¦»ä¹‹ï¼Œæ”»å…¶æ— å¤‡ï¼Œå‡ºå…¶ä¸æ„。æ¤å…µå®¶ä¹‹èƒœï¼Œä¸å¯å…ˆä¼ 也。“也就是说，打仗是ä¸è®²è§„则的，åªè¦èƒ½èµ¢å¾—胜利，å„ç§æ‰‹æ®µéƒ½å¯ä»¥ç”¨ï¼Œæ‰€è°“â€å…µä¸åŽŒè¯ˆâ€œã€‚而在战争ä¸å› 讲究规则åƒäº†è´¥ä»—的宋襄公历æ¥éƒ½æ˜¯è¢«äººä»¬å˜²ç¬‘çš„è¯æŸ„。å¸æ³•çŠ¹å¦‚战争。这æ£å¦‚ä¸å›½å¤ä»£çš„ä½è®¼å¸ˆæ‰€è¯´çš„：â€å‡¡æž„è®¼ä¹‹äº‹ï¼Œä¸Žè¡Œå…µæ— å¼‚ï¼Œæˆ‘è‹¥å†³å‘Šï¼Œå½¼ç¤ºä»¥ä¸å‘Šä¹‹å½¢ï¼Œä½¿ä¸é˜²å¤‡ï¼Œæˆ‘è‹¥ä¸å‘Šï¼Œåˆ™è™šå¼ 以必告之状，使之ç•æ³•ã€‚所谓用而计之ä¸ç”¨ï¼Œèƒ½è€Œç¤ºä¹‹ä¸èƒ½ï¼Œè™šå®žå®žè™šè¯¡é“也。“战争的目的在于赢得胜利，赢得胜利的关键在于消ç敌人；而å¸æ³•çš„目的在于æ£ç¡®è£åˆ¤ï¼Œæ£ç¡®è£åˆ¤çš„关键则在于å‘现真实。
于是，åªè¦èƒ½å‘现事实，什么手段都å¯ä»¥ç”¨ï¼Œä»€ä¹ˆæ ·çš„技术都ä¸æŽ’斥。于是，在ä¸å›½å¤ä»£å¸æ³•ä¸ï¼Œæ³•å®˜â€œè¯ˆä¾›'ã€"骗供'ã€â€è¯±ä¾›â€œå±¡è§ä¸é²œï¼Œåˆ‘讯逼供更是å¸ç©ºè§æƒ¯ï¼Œå¹¶ä¸”这些往往被视为â€å¦™åˆ¤â€œçš„技巧æ¥å®£æ‰¬ã€‚è¿™æ ·çš„â€ç»“果主义“æ€ç»´ä»ä¸ºçŽ°ä»£å¸æ³•æ‰€ç§‰æ‰¿ã€‚åœ¨è¿™æ ·æ€ç»´ä¸‹ï¼Œæ³•å¾‹äº‹å®žä¸Žå®¢è§‚真实â€æ³•å¾‹ä¹‹å†…çš„æ£ä¹‰â€œä¸Ž''法律之外的æ£ä¹‰â€å‘生了混淆，å¸æ³•çš„“过程性'ã€â€å½¢å¼æ€§â€œçš„价值å—到了排斥â€å¸æ³•æ˜¯ä¸€ä¸ªåœ¨æ»¡è¶³ç¨‹åºæ€§è¦ä»¶çš„基础上得出结论的过程“的观念ä¸èƒ½ç¡®ç«‹ï¼Œ9相å，å‘现真实æˆä¸ºäº†è£åˆ¤æ¡ˆä»¶çš„终æžç›®æ ‡æˆ–唯一宗旨，一切å¸æ³•æ´»åŠ¨éƒ½è¦ä»¥æ¤ä¸ºä¸å¿ƒå±•å¼€ï¼Œä¸€åˆ‡æœ‰ç¢äº‹å®žå‘现的环节都应被排除，一切与之冲çªçš„价值都应该被抛弃。所以，凡是知é“案件情况的人都应该出æ¥ä½œè¯ï¼Œå‡¡æ˜¯èƒ½å¤Ÿè¯æ˜Žæ¡ˆä»¶äº‹å®žçš„手段都å¯ä»¥é‡‡ç”¨ã€‚既然如æ¤ï¼Œå³ä½¿æ˜¯äº²å±žçŸ¥é“案件事实，也ä¸èƒ½çŸ¥æƒ…ä¸ä¸¾ï¼Œæ›´ä¸èƒ½åŒ…庇çªè—。刑诉法ä¸å…³äºŽ''凡是知é“案件情况的人都有作è¯çš„义务â€çš„规定，其实就是该æ€ç»´åœ¨çŽ°ä»£å¸æ³•ä¸çš„ä½“çŽ°ã€‚åœ¨è¿™æ ·çš„æ€ç»´å’Œç†å¿µä¸‹ï¼Œåœ¨å®žè·µä¸å¸æ³•æœºå…³ä¸ä½†æŠŠäº²å±žçš„è¯è¨€å½“æˆé‡è¦çš„è¯æ®ï¼Œè€Œä¸”还期待亲属能够作出或æä¾›ä¸åˆ©äºŽå½“事人的è¯è¨€æˆ–其他è¯æ®ï¼Œå› 为在他们看æ¥èƒŒç¦»å¸¸ç†å’Œå¸¸æƒ…çš„è¯æ®æ›´æœ‰è¯æ˜ŽåŠ›ã€‚
æ£æ˜¯åœ¨è¿™æ ·çš„æ€ç»´ä¸‹ï¼Œåœ¨å¸æ³•è¿‡ç¨‹ä¸ï¼Œäº²å±žæ供的è¯æ®ï¼Œç‰¹åˆ«æ˜¯ä¸åˆ©äºŽå½“事人的è¯æ®ä¸ä½†ä¸å—é™åˆ¶ï¼Œç›¸å，让亲属æ供线索或é…åˆè¿˜æˆä¸ºä¾¦æŸ¥æœºå…³ç ´æ¡ˆç»å¸¸ä¾èµ–的手段。
所以，在官方è¯è¯ä¸è¿™æ ·çš„å™äº‹å±¡è§ä¸é²œï¼šâ€œåœ¨ç¡®å®šæŠ“æ•å¯¹è±¡åŽï¼ŒåŠžæ¡ˆæ°‘è¦ä»Žè¯¥é€ƒçŠ¯äº²å±žå…¥æ‰‹ï¼Œæœ€ç»ˆé”定其æ¯äº²ä½åœ¨å®‰è‚ƒé•‡å¤å…´è¥¿è·¯ä¸€å°åŒºå†…，éšåŽç«‹å³ç»„织è¦åŠ›åœ¨å°åŒºå¤–围进行布控。ç»è¿‡ä¸¤å¤©ä¸¤å¤œè‰°è‹¦è¹²å®ˆï¼ŒäºŽ11月17日下åˆåœ¨å°åŒºå†…将在逃犯马æŸæŠ“获。â€
日，汉阴勹16特大æ€äººæ¡ˆçŠ¯ç½ªå«Œç–‘人邱兴åŽçš„儿女，在安康è¦æ–¹çš„陪护下爬上一é“é“å±±æ¢ï¼Œè¯•å›¾ç”¨ä»–们的深情感化è—åœ¨æ·±å±±çš„çˆ¶äº²æ—©æ—¥å½’æ¡ˆã€‚â€œåœ¨è¿™æ ·çš„æ€ç»´ä¸‹ï¼Œå¦‚何从犯罪嫌疑人的亲属处获å–è¯æ®ç”šè‡³æˆä¸ºäº†å¸æ³•äººå‘˜å¿…备的侦查技能：â€åº”当利用'实则虚之，虚则实之，虚实相应'的方法尽å¯èƒ½å¤šçš„从犯罪嫌疑人家属处获å–案件信æ¯å’ŒçŠ¯ç½ªå«Œç–‘人个人信æ¯â€œï¼šâ€åœ¨çŠ¯ç½ªå«Œç–‘人家属æ€åº¦ä¸ç«¯çš„情况下，晓以利害，一è¯ä¸çš„，促其如实作è¯ï¼›ç„¶åŽæ‰©å¤§æˆ˜æžœï¼Œä½œä¸ºè¯¢é—®çŠ¯ç½ªå«Œç–‘人的'炮弹'从而å„ä¸ªå‡»ç ´ï¼Œå½»åº•æŸ¥æ˜Žæ¡ˆæƒ…â€œã€‚æ£å› 为å¸æ³•æœºå…³ç§‰æŒç€è¿™æ ·çš„æ€ç»´å¹¶åœ¨å·¥ä½œä¸å†…化为一ç§ä¹ 惯，所以当亲属作è¯è±å…问题在刑诉法修改阶段一ç»æ出便é到侦查机关的å对就ä¸è¶³ä¸ºå¥‡äº†ã€‚
ç”±æ¤çœ‹æ¥ï¼Œä¼ 统文化带给亲属è±å…æƒçš„既有''利“的一é¢ï¼Œåˆæœ‰''弊â€çš„一é¢ã€‚ä¼ ç»Ÿæ–‡åŒ–çš„å¤å…´ä¸ºâ€œäº²äº²ç›¸éšâ€çš„回归æ供了åˆç†æ€§å’ŒåŠ¨åŠ›ä¹‹æºï¼Œç”±æ¤''大义ç亲“法制的åšå†°å¼€å§‹æ¾åŠ¨ï¼Œäº²å±žè±å…æƒé¦–先在作è¯é¢†åŸŸå¯åŠ¨ï¼Œä½†æ¥è‡ªä¼ 统的æ€ç»´æ–¹å¼åˆä¸ºæ‚–离规律的å¸æ³•è¿ä½œæ供了ç†ç”±ï¼Œè¿›è€Œä¸ºçœŸæ£çš„亲属作è¯è±å…æƒè®¾ç½®äº†ç§ç§éšœç¢ï¼Œè‡´ä½¿è¯¥åˆ¶åº¦çš„原åˆåŠŸèƒ½ä¸èƒ½å®žçŽ°ã€‚刑诉法第188æ¡çš„规定实际上是两ç§æ–‡åŒ–æƒåŠ›åšå¼ˆçš„结果，在这ç§æ–‡åŒ–çš„åšå¼ˆä¸äº²å±žä½œè¯è±å…æƒä¾¿å…·æœ‰äº†ä¸å›½ç‹¬æœ‰çš„é¢ç›¸ã€‚
å››ã€äº²å±žè±å…æƒåœ¨å½“代ä¸å›½çš„命è¿å’Œå‡ºè·¯æ°‘众的需求虽然是项æƒåˆ©ç”Ÿé•¿çš„ä¸»å¯¼å› ç´ ï¼Œä½†æ˜¯å›½å®¶å¯¹æ¤éœ€æ±‚的承认则是它æˆä¸ºæœ‰ä¿éšœçš„ã€å¯æ“ä½œçš„é¡¹åˆ¶åº¦åŒ–è¯‰æ±‚çš„æ ¸å¿ƒè¦ç´ ；既然æƒåˆ©æ˜¯ç§è¯‰æ±‚，那么æƒåˆ©æˆé•¿å°±æœ‰èµ–于人们的æ„识，而个国家的社会文化对这ç§æ„识的养æˆå…·æœ‰è‡³å…³é‡è¦çš„作用。所以民众ã€å›½å®¶ã€æ–‡åŒ–ä¼ ç»Ÿæ˜¯å½±å“当下ä¸å›½æƒåˆ©ç”Ÿé•¿çš„三大è¦ç´ 。拉德布é²èµ«æ›¾ç»è¨€åŠä¸€ç§ç«‹æ³•ä¸Šçš„''目的转æ¢â€œçŽ°è±¡ï¼Œå³''一ç§æ³•å¾‹è®¾ç½®ä¼Šå§‹çš„目的早已迷失，ä¸å¯è¿½å¯»ï¼Œä½†å®ƒå´å‘ç€æˆªç„¶ç›¸åçš„æ–¹å‘å‘展出公ç†çš„效果，以æ¤ä½œä¸ºå…¶ç»§ç»å˜åœ¨ä¸”言之æˆç†çš„目的。â€å…¶å®žåœ¨åˆ‘诉法第188æ¡ä¸Šå°±å‘ç”Ÿäº†è¿™æ ·ä¸€ç§''目的转æ¢â€œã€‚当一项常规性的立法在ä¸å›½ä¸èƒ½ä¸å¯åŠ¨ï¼Œè€Œè¿™ç§ç«‹æ³•åˆæœ‰å¯èƒ½è§¦åŠä¼ 统的利益时，那么该立法ä¸çš„制度便会以一ç§''目的转æ¢â€çš„å½¢å¼è¡¨çŽ°å‡ºæ¥ï¼Œå³åœ¨è¯¥åˆ¶åº¦ä¸Šå‘生ç§åŠŸèƒ½å¼‚化，异化åŽçš„制度虽有其åï¼Œä½†å·²æ— å…¶å®žã€‚è¿™ç§''目的转æ¢â€œå…¶å®žå°±æ˜¯è´¹å通先生所说的ä¸å›½æ–‡åŒ–ä¸çš„é¢å。é¢å是表é¢çš„æ— è¿ã€‚â€è¿™ç§â€œå实分离â€å’Œâ€œç›®çš„转æ¢â€å°±ç”ŸåŠ¨åœ°ä½“现在了刑诉法第188æ¡çš„亲属作è¯è±å…æƒçš„立法之ä¸äº†ã€‚在民众需求é¢å‰ï¼Œç«‹æ³•è€…有æ„è¦å¯åŠ¨æ¤ç«‹æ³•ï¼Œåœ¨é¡½å›ºçš„部门利益é¢å‰ï¼Œåœ¨åšç¡¬çš„ä¼ ç»Ÿå¸æ³•è§‚念é¢å‰ï¼Œç«‹æ³•è€…åˆå¿…须作出妥å，妥ååŽçš„立法åªç»™äº²å±žä½œè¯è±å…æƒç•™ä¸‹æ¥ä¸€å¼ ''é¢åâ€œï¼Œè¿™æ ·ï¼Œä¸å›½é¢ç›¸ä¸‹çš„â€äº²å±žå‡ºåºä½œè¯è±å…æƒâ€œå·²ä¸Žæ°‘众所期待æ„义上的''亲属作è¯è±å…æƒâ€å¤§ç›¸å¾„åºã€‚å¯¹äºŽè¿™æ ·çš„ç§è½å·®ï¼Œå›½å®¶å¸¸å¸¸ä¼šä»¥â€œç«‹æ³•è¦ä¸Žä¸å›½å…·ä½“国情相适应â€æ¥è¯ 释。
亲属è±å…æƒåœ¨å½“下ä¸å›½çš„刑事诉讼领域刚一å°è¯•ä¾¿é到了''目的转æ¢â€œçš„命è¿ï¼Œè¿™ä¸€è½¬æ¢ä½¿è¯¥åˆ¶åº¦çš„原åˆåŠŸèƒ½å‡ 乎消耗殆尽。尽管如æ¤ï¼Œåœ¨ç¬”者看æ¥ï¼Œæˆ‘们ä»ç„¶è¦ç†æ€§åœ°çœ‹å¾…这一现象。新刑诉法第188æ¡å¯¹æ‰€è§„定的â€äº²å±žå‡ºåºä½œè¯è±å…æƒâ€œè™½ç„¶æœ‰å¾ˆå¤§çš„å±€é™æ€§ï¼Œä½†æ˜¯å®ƒè‡³å°‘表明立法者开始关注亲属关系在å¸æ³•ä¸çš„特殊性问题，至少表明立法者开始æ„识到在å¸æ³•ä¸ï¼Œåœ¨å‘现犯罪事实之外还有其他价值需è¦ä¿æŠ¤ã€‚这些关注和æ„识在æžâ€å·¦â€œçš„â€é©å‘½æ³•åˆ¶â€œä¸‹æ˜¯ä¸å¯èƒ½æœ‰çš„ï¼Œä»Žæ ¹æœ¬ä¸Šè¯´è¿™æ˜¯å½“ä»£ä¸å›½æƒåˆ©è§‚念和法治10æ„识å‘展到定程度åŽæ‰è¡ç”Ÿå‡ºæ¥çš„。对善良人性的尊é‡æ˜¯ä¸–界立法的潮æµï¼Œå› æ¤äº²å±žè±å…æƒåœ¨ä¸–ç•Œä¸Šå‡ ä¹Žæ‰€æœ‰çš„å›½å®¶éƒ½èŽ·å¾—äº†æ³•å¾‹ä¸Šçš„è®¤å¯ã€‚在ç»æµŽã€æ³•å¾‹ä¸€ä½“化的全çƒåŒ–时代，ä¸å›½å¹¶ä¸èƒ½é•¿æœŸç«™åœ¨è¿™ä¸€æ½®æµä¹‹å¤–。å¦å¤–，ä¸å›½æ˜¯ä¸€ä¸ªæœ€é‡äº²æƒ…伦ç†çš„国度，亲属关系在ä¸å›½æœ€ä¸ºå‘è¾¾ï¼Œäº²ä¼¦ä¼ ç»Ÿæ·±åŽšè€Œæµ“é‡å¹¶åœ¨å½“代ä¸å›½å¼€å§‹å¤å…´ï¼Œè¿™äº›éƒ½ä¼šæˆä¸ºæŽ¨åŠ¨äº²å±žè±å…æƒåˆ¶åº¦å¾—以确立的é‡è¦åŠ¨åŠ›ã€‚我们从先å‰çš„民间舆论对河北çœé«˜é™¢çš„实施细则的激烈的批判和的刑诉法è‰æ¡ˆçš„ä¸æˆç†Ÿçš„褒扬就看到了这一点。由æ¤ï¼Œæˆ‘们对亲属è±å…æƒåœ¨ä¸å›½çš„å‰é€”ä»æŒä¹è§‚çš„æ€åº¦ã€‚如å‰æ‰€è¿°ï¼Œæƒåˆ©çš„æˆé•¿ä¸ä»…需è¦æ°‘ä¼—æƒåˆ©æ„识的增长，还有赖于国家ä¸æ–地â€æ¾ç»‘“和â€æ”¾æƒâ€œã€‚国家对''大义ç亲â€ä»Ž''强迫“到â€é¼“励“（河北çœé«˜é™¢çš„规定）å†åˆ°â€æœ‰é™åº¦çš„é™åˆ¶â€œï¼ˆåˆ‘诉法第188æ¡ï¼‰çš„过程实际是一个在法律上对亲属ä¸æ–地''æ¾ç»‘â€å’Œâ€œæ”¾æƒâ€çš„过程，æ£æ˜¯æœ‰äº†è¿™è¿‡ç¨‹ï¼Œäº²å±žè±å…æƒæ‰å¯ä»¥èŒèŠ½å’Œç»§ç»æˆé•¿ã€‚如å¡å°”波普所说的，人的认识是个ä¸æ–试错和è¯ä¼ªçš„过程，由æ¤æˆ‘们也å¯ä»¥æŠŠåˆ‘诉法第188æ¡çš„规定视为对亲属è±å…æƒçš„一次''试错性“ç»éªŒï¼Œåœ¨ä»Žâ€å¤§ä¹‰ç亲“到â€äº²äº²ç›¸éšâ€œçš„过程ä¸ï¼Œåªæœ‰ä¼´éšç€ä¸€æ¬¡æ¬¡çš„试错和è¯ä¼ªï¼Œæœ€ç»ˆçœŸæ£æ„义上的亲属è±å…æƒæ‰èƒ½è¢«ç¡®ç«‹ã€‚å¡å°”波普还指出，社会的å‘展应该ä¾é ç§â€é›¶ç¢Žå·¥ç¨‹â€œï¼Œå³åœ¨ä¸æ–çš„â€å¯é”™æ€§â€œçš„试验ä¸ä¸€ç‚¹ä¸€æ»´åœ°å¾ªåºæ¸è¿›ã€‚ç”±æ¤è€Œè¨€ï¼Œåˆ¶åº¦çš„确立也应如æ¤ï¼Œä¹Ÿéœ€è¦ä¸€ä¸ªä¸æ–完善的â€é›¶ç¢Žå·¥ç¨‹â€œï¼Œç”±æ¤çœ‹æ¥ï¼Œå½“下的亲属作è¯è±å…æƒçš„å°è¯•å³ä½¿æ˜¯ä¸æˆåŠŸçš„，也是有æ„义的。也å¯ä»¥è¿™æ ·è¯´ï¼Œå¯¹äºŽä¸å›½è¿™æ ·çš„一个åŽæ³•å¾‹å‘å±•å›½å®¶ï¼Œåœ¨çŠ¬ç‰™äº¤é”™çš„åˆ©ç›Šæ ¼å±€ä¸ï¼Œç«‹æ³•çš„试错代价是ä¸å¯é¿å…的。æ¤ä¸ï¼Œç”±ä¸€åœºåœºå¤æ‚çš„åšå¼ˆè€Œå¸¦ç»™ç«‹æ³•è€…çš„çº ç»“å’Œæ— å¥ˆï¼Œæˆ‘ä»¬åº”ç»™äºˆå¿…è¦çš„ç†è§£å’Œå®½å®¹ã€‚
亲属è±å…æƒåˆ¶åº¦åœ¨ä¸å›½ç¡®ç«‹æœ€å¤§çš„éšœç¢èŽ«è¿‡äºŽå¸æ³•æœºå…³çš„æŠµè§¦ã€‚æ— è®ºæ˜¯å¯¹äº²å±žé—´çš„åŒ…åº‡ã€çªèµƒçš„å…罚还是ä¸å¼ºè¿«äº²å±žä½œè¯éƒ½æ— ç–‘ç»™å¸æ³•æœºå…³çš„å·¥ä½œå¢žåŠ äº†éš¾åº¦ï¼Œä¸ºå…¶æƒåŠ›çš„行使构æˆäº†å®žè´¨æ€§çš„é™åˆ¶ã€‚è¿™ç§æŠµè§¦è¡¨é¢ä¸Šæ˜¯æºäºŽéƒ¨é—¨åˆ©ç›Šï¼Œè€Œä»Žæ›´æ·±å±‚次上看则æºäºŽä»¥å‘现事实为终æžç›®çš„的结果主义æ€ç»´ã€‚å› æ¤ï¼Œäº²å±žè±å…æƒåˆ¶åº¦çœŸæ£ç¡®ç«‹æœ‰èµ–于å¸æ³•æœºå…³æ€ç»´æ–¹å¼çš„转æ¢å’Œå¯¹å¸æ³•æ€§è´¨çš„é‡æ–°è®¤è¯†ã€‚å¸æ³•æœºå…³å¿…é¡»æ ‘ç«‹''诉讼活动并ä¸ä»…仅是一个以å‘现事实真相为目的的认识活动而更是一个包å«ç€ä¸€ç³»åˆ—诉讼价值的实现和选择的过程“的ç†å¿µã€‚11åœ¨è¿™æ ·çš„ç†å¿µä¸‹ï¼Œå‘现事实åªæ˜¯å¸æ³•æ´»åŠ¨ä¸çš„一ç§ä»·å€¼ï¼Œå½“它与人æƒã€äººæ€§ã€äººé™…间的基本信任ç‰ä»·å€¼ç›¸å†²çªçš„时候，其è¦ä¸ºè¿™äº›ä»·å€¼çš„实现让路。åª
Hexagonal Wire Netting
Hex netting is commonly known as chicken wire, poultry wire, poultry netting, and hexagonal mesh. Hex netting is a widely used and versatile Wire Mesh. It is often used to build chicken coops or other fencing for chickens or other animals. Additionally, hex netting is an economical product used to secure other materials in place, such as insulation to roofs. Hex netting is also ideal for lawn and garden and other home projects.
Hexagonal Wire Netting,Galvanized Hexagonal Wire Netting,Pvc Coated Hexagonal Wire Netting,Hexagonal Wire Netting-Galvanized Before Weave
HENGSHUI YUZHENG IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD. , https://www.yuzhengnails.com